Cannabinoids and Pain Relief

A Literature Review

Matthew J Atha Independent Drug Monitoring Unit

September 2006

Introduction:

Pain relief (analgesia) or decreased pain sensitivity (antinociception) are among the most commonly-cited therapeutic effects of smoking cannabis. Although cannabis products have been used for thousands of years to treat pain and other conditions, it was not until the discovery of the 'cannabis receptor' in the late 1980s that modern medicine started to take cannabis seriously. The past decade has seen an explosion of research into cannabinoid metabolism, with at least two types of receptors (CB1 in the brain and spinal cord, and CB2 in the peripheral tissues) identified, and a number of endogenous ligands (endocannabinoids), the best known of which is anandamide. Pharmaceutical research is developing apace, with discovery of a number of substances (synthetic cannabinoids) which both bind to the receptors producing an effect (agonists) and block receptors preventing any effect (antagonists).

Research has moved on from asking 'whether' i.e. do cannabinoids produce analgesia there is now overwhelming evidence of this, through the 'how' via receptor-mediated regulation of pain thresholds in the peripheral and spinal tissues, towards the question of how to produce analgesia more effectively, and the further questions arising from these discoveries. The 'Holy Grail' of cannabinoid research is to develop a drug which specifically targets the pain mechanisms, but does not produce the psychotropic effects (the 'high') from THC. Discovery of the endocannabinoid system has revolutionised pain research, and led to greater understanding of brain and spinal function.

One of the first modern reviews of the use of cannabis as an analgesic (pain relief) agent was undertaken by Professor Rafael Mechoulam[1]. A number of researchers using D9 THC injections in mice, with dosages of 5-80 mg/kg, have observed significant antinociceptive (pain relieving) activity against thermal, mechanical, electrical and chemical stimuli. In some cases the effect of cannabinoids was stronger than with opioid preparations, and other researchers noted a flat response curve (i.e. once the effective dose level is reached, further dose increases cause no additional effect). Other researchers have found cannabis to potentiate the analgesic effects of opiates[2]. Significant analgesia has been produced in animals with injections into the brain stem and spinal cord.[3] [4]

The dosages required to produce detectable pain relief in animal models were substantially in excess of dosages encountered in normal social use (typically 0.1-1.0 mg/kg). The effective dose of THC in the early mouse studies (approx. 5mg/kg) would be the equivalent of an average 70kg man consuming 350mg THC, or smoking 10 grams of cannabis with a potency of 3.5%. However in most clinical trials of cannabis-extracts, dosages have generally been much lower than would be encountered in typical social use.

The following sections provide detailed reviews and citations from original scientific papers, including anecdotal evidence, animal and receptor studies, human studies including clinical trials, and learned reviews.

Anecdotal Evidence, Surveys & Patient Reports

Many new leads for medical research have arisen from reports of cannabis users as to how the drug has affected their condition. Such reports must be treated with caution as the effects described might be due to placebo-effects or increased general feelings of well-being. However the results of surveys, particularly where a number of patients report similar symptoms, provide an early warning of potential effects and side-effects of cannabis and cannabinoids.

In Judge Young's report[5] numerous cases histories were described outlining the use of cannabis to reduce muscle tension (spasticity) in individuals with multiple sclerosis or spinal injury. The potential efficacy of cannabis in treatment of MS is increasingly accepted by patients and medical practitioners alike. Gill & Williams[6], in a preliminary study of attitudes to cannabis-based medicine among 67 chronic pain patients in the UK, found "Fifty-two percent of patients were doubtful about taking cannabinoids: unwillingness was strongly associated with specific concerns about side effects, addiction, tolerance, and losing control but not with general beliefs about medication or personal or medical variables other than age" In a similar German study of 128 patients, Schnelle et al[7] found "The most frequently mentioned indications for medicinal cannabis use were depression (12.0%), multiple sclerosis (10.8%), HIV-infection (9.0%), migraine (6.6%), asthma (6.0%), back pain (5.4%), hepatitis C (4. 8%), sleeping disorders (4.8%), epilepsy (3.6%), spasticity (3.6%), headache (3.6%), alcoholism (3.0%), glaucoma (3.0%), nausea (3.0%), disk prolapse (2.4%), and spinal cord injury (2.4%)... 72.2% of the patients stated the symptoms of their illness to have 'much improved' after cannabis ingestion, 23.4% stated to have 'slightly improved', 4.8% experienced 'no change' and 1.6% described that their symptoms got 'worse'... 60.8% stated (themselves) to be 'very satisfied', 24.0% 'satisfied', 11.2% 'partly satisfied' and 4.0% were 'not satisfied'. 70.8% experienced no side effects, 26.4% described 'moderate' and 3.3% 'strong' side effects."

A study of 50 medicinal- cannabis using patients in Canada by Ogborne et al[8] found "They reported using cannabis for a variety of conditions including HIV-AIDS-related problems, chronic pain, depression, anxiety, menstrual cramps, migraine, narcotic addiction as well as everyday aches, pains, stresses and sleeping difficulties." Fishbain et al[9] found a significant minority of chronic pain patients in the USA used cannabis but were unwilling to admit this to their doctors or researchers. Mechoulam[10] noted "Illegally... smoking marijuana... is used for ameliorating the symptoms of multiple sclerosis, against pain, and in a variety of other diseases." Ware et al[11] studied 15 patients who claimed to use herbal cannabis for therapeutic reasons, noting "Twelve patients reported improvement in pain and mood, while 11 reported improvement in sleep. Eight patients reported a 'high'; six denied a 'high'. Tolerance to cannabis was not reported" and concluded "Small doses of smoked cannabis may improve pain, mood and sleep in some patients with chronic pain." Following a larger Canadian survey, Ware et al[12] concluded "cannabis use is prevalent among the chronic non-cancer pain population, for a wide range of symptoms, with considerable variability in the amounts used." Page et al[13] reported a survey of MS patients in Western Canada "Symptoms reported to be ameliorated included anxiety/depression, spasticity and chronic pain.". Clark et al[14] found "Medical cannabis use was associated with male gender, tobacco use, and recreational cannabis use. The symptoms reported by medical cannabis users to be most effectively relieved were stress, sleep, mood, stiffness/spasm, and pain" Swift et al[15], found among Australian medical users "Long term and regular medical cannabis use was frequently reported for multiple medical conditions including chronic pain (57%), depression (56%), arthritis (35%), persistent nausea (27%) and weight loss (26%). Cannabis was perceived to provide "great relief" overall (86%), and substantial relief of specific symptoms such as pain, nausea and insomnia. It was also typically perceived as superior to other medications in terms of undesirable effects, and the extent of relief provided." In a survey of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) patients using cannabis Amtmann et al[16] reported "cannabis may be moderately effective at reducing symptoms of appetite loss, depression, pain, spasticity, and drooling. Cannabis was reported ineffective in reducing difficulties with speech and swallowing, and sexual dysfunction. The longest relief was reported for depression (approximately two to three hours)."

A survey of patients using smoked cannabis in the Netherlands by Gorter et al[17] found "A majority (64.1%) of patients reported a good or excellent effect on their symptoms. Of these patients, approximately 44% used cannabis for >/=5 months. Indications were neurologic disorders, pain, musculoskeletal disorders, and cancer anorexia/cachexia. Inhaled cannabis was perceived as more effective than oral administration. Reported side effects were generally mild." In a similar study, Erkens et al[18] noted "Of all patients, 42% suffered from multiple sclerosis, 11% suffered from rheumatic diseases, and 60% of respondents already used cannabis before the legalization. Cannabis was mainly used for chronic pain and muscle cramp/stiffness.The indication of medicinal cannabis use was in accordance with the labeled indications."

Ware et al[19] conducted a survey of UK cannabis patients, reporting "Medicinal cannabis use was reported by patients with chronic pain (25%), multiple sclerosis and depression (22% each), arthritis (21%) and neuropathy (19%). Medicinal cannabis use was associated with younger age, male gender and previous recreational use (p < 0.001)." In a survey of UK Aids patients, Woolridge et al[20] reported "Up to one-third (27%, 143/523) reported using cannabis for treating symptoms. Patients reported improved appetite (97%), muscle pain (94%), nausea (93%), anxiety (93%), nerve pain (90%), depression (86%), and paresthesia (85%). Many cannabis users (47%) reported associated memory deterioration. Symptom control using cannabis is widespread in HIV outpatients. A large number of patients reported that cannabis improved symptom control" A further survey of sickle-cell disease sufferers by Howard et al[21] noted "The main reasons for use were to reduce pain in 52%, and to induce relaxation or relieve anxiety and depression in 39%."

The 1994 IDMU study of cannabis users[22] asked respondents to report any physical or mental health problems and/or benefits which they attributed to cannabis use. Thirty two individuals cited "pain relief" as the main benefit they received, the fourth most common benefit reported (after relaxation (n=89), stress relief (n=67) and improvements in personal development and outlook (n=36)). Two individuals specifically mentioned use of cannabis as a muscle relaxant.

Animal Studies

The discovery of endocannabinoids and receptor types have opened up a field of research into potential drugs based on anandamide and other endocannabinoids[23]. Antagonists (blockers) of the cannabinoid receptors have been shown to increase sensitivity to pain in laboratory animals.

Meng et al[24] reported the analgesic activity of the cannabinoids to result from a brainstem circuit (rostral ventromedial medulla - RVM) which also contributes to the action of morphine, but in a pharmacologically different manner from morphine. They claimed that increasing or decreasing levels endogenous cannabinoids (e.g. anandaminde) would normally regulate pain thresholds through modulation of RVM activity, and concluded: "analgesia produced by cannabinoids and opioids involves similar brainstem circuitry and that cannabinoids are indeed centrally acting analgesics with a new mechanism of action." Meng & Johansen[25] noted "cannabinoids act directly within the RVM to affect off-cell activity, providing one mechanism by which cannabinoids produce antinociception" de Novellis et al[26] reported "s.c. injection of formalin modifies RVM neuronal activities and this effect is prevented by PAG cannabinoid receptor stimulation. Moreover, the physiological stimulation of PAG mGlu5, but not mGlu1 glutamate receptors, seems to be required for the cannabinoid-mediated effect."

Strangman et al[27] found that pre-treatment with the cannabinoid antagonist SR141716A significantly increased the response to a noxious & painful chemical stimulus in laboratory animals, and concluded: "endogenous cannabinoids serve naturally to modulate the maintenance of pain following repeated noxious stimulation" Lever et al found the cannabinoid antagonist SR 141716A increased the release of the excitatory neurotransmitted substance P in response to painful stimulation, suggesting tonic CB1 receptor activity inhibits the release of excitatory neurotransmitters in response to pain. Salio et al[28] reported "Several lines of evidence show that endogenous and exogenous cannabinoids modulate pain transmission at the spinal level through specific cannabinoid-1 (CB1) receptors." Costa et al[29] found CB1 antagonists reversed the effects of anandamide in rats, and Martin et al[30] found SR141716A blocked CB1-mediated analgesia, however Beaulieu et al[31] failed to replicate the pain-sensitising effects of CB1 antagonists in the rat formalin test. Carta et al[32] found dopamine antagonists blocked the analgesic effects of THC in rats. Chapman[33] reported "tonic cannabinoid CB1 receptor activation, but not CB2 receptor activation, attenuates acute nociceptive transmission, at the level of the spinal cord" In mice, Guhring et al[34] found the CB1 cannabinoid receptor agonist HU210 showed "higher(antinociceptive) efficacy and potency than morphine".

In mice, Fride et al[35] reported "(+)-Cannabidiol-DMH inhibited the peripheral pain response and arachidonic-acid-induced inflammation of the ear." Than et al[36] reported "an alpha2-adrenoceptor agonist or micro opioid receptor agonist when combined with a cannabinoid receptor agonist showed significant synergy in antinociception in the hot plate test. However, for the tail flick nociceptive response to heat, only cannabinoid and micro opioid receptor antinociceptive synergy was demonstrated." Exposing mice to marijuana smoke, Varvel et al[37] found "the acute cannabinoid effects of marijuana smoke exposure on analgesia, hypothermia, and catalepsy in mice result from delta9-THC content acting at CB1 receptors and that the non-delta9-THC constituents of marijuana (at concentrations relevant to those typically consumed) influence these effects only minimally, if at all." Ulugol et al[38] found "WIN 55,212-2, a cannabinoid agonist, and the NSAID ketorolac, either alone or in combination, produced dose-dependent antinociception in the writhing test. Isobolographic analysis showed additive interactions between WIN 55,212-2 and ketorolac when they were coadministered systemically." and concluded "The combination of cannabinoids and NSAIDs may have utility in the pharmacotherapy of pain."

Studying the relationship between endocannabinoids and spinal fos proteins in rats, Nackley et al[39] reported "These data provide direct evidence that a peripheral cannabinoid mechanism suppresses the development of inflammation-evoked neuronal activity at the level of the spinal dorsal horn and implicate a role for CB(2) and CB(1) in peripheral cannabinoid modulation of inflammatory nociception." Finn et al[40], investigating the role of the periaqueductal grey matter in the rat, postulated "a role for the PAG in both cannabinoid-mediated anti-nociceptive and anti-aversive responses." and noted[41] "These data suggest an important role for the CB(1) receptor in mediating fear-conditioned analgesia and provide evidence for differential modulation of conditioned aversive behaviour by CB(1) receptors during tonic, persistent pain."

Studying the interaction of cannabinoids and NSAID drugs in mice, Anikwue et al[42] noted "In animals given chronic Delta(9)-THC, only diclofenac and acetaminophen (paracetamol) were active", Ates et al[43] observed "endocannabinoids play a major role in mediating flurbiprofen-induced antinociception at the spinal level." In rats, Ottani et al[44] found "the analgesic effect of paracetamol is prevented by two antagonists at cannabinoid CB1 receptors (AM281 and SR141716A) at doses that prevent the analgesic activity of the cannabinoid CB1 agonist HU210." Guindon & Beaulieu[45] noted "locally injected anandamide, ibuprofen, rofecoxib and their combinations decreased pain behavior in neuropathic animals. Local use of endocannabinoids to treat neuropathic pain may be an interesting way to treat this condition without having the deleterious central effects of systemic cannabinoids." Guindon et al[46] later reported "The combination of anandamide with ibuprofen produced synergistic antinociceptive effects involving both cannabinoid CB(1) and CB(2) receptors." Investigating interactions between analgesic activities of cannabis and cocaine, Forman[47] reported "These findings suggest that activation of the CB1 receptor participates significantly in antinociception resulting from treatment with cocaine" Helyes et al[48] found cannabinoid blockers increased pain perception in rats "Both SR141716A and SR144528 increased hyperalgesia, indicating that endogenous cannabinoids acting on CB(1) and peripheral CB(2)-like receptors play substantial role in neuropathic conditions to diminish hyperalgesia."

Maccarone et al[49] found anandamide to stimulate platelets, an opposite action to aspirin, suggesting cannabinoids may contribute to analgesia without the effects on blood clotting or internal bleeding associated with heavy or regular aspirin use. Corchero et al[50], in a study of gene expression on receptor activity, suggested: 'a possible interaction between the cannabinoid and opioid systems in the caudate-putamen' However Hamann et al[51] found analgesia caused by the synthetic cannabinoid Nabilone not to have an opioid receptor component. Fowler et al[52] found evidence that ibuprofen and similar drugs may act by reducing the rate at which a natural cannabinoid - anandamide - is broken down in the body.

Martin et al[53], studying the sites in the brain mediating cannabinoid analgesia, found that the cannabinoid agonist WIN55212-2 'significantly elevated tail-flick latencies when injected into the amygdala, the lateral posterior and submedius regions of the thalamus, the superior colliculus and the noradrenergic A5 region.' For peripheral activity, Hohmann et al[54] considered their results to 'provide anatomical evidence for presynaptic as well as postsynaptic localization of cannabinoid receptors in the spinal dorsal horn.' In a study of spinal injury in rats, Kawasaki et al[55] concluded "after nerve injury, opioids lose their capability to suppress C-fiber-induced spinal neuron activation in the injured L(5) but not in the intact L(4) spinal segment, whereas cannabinoids still maintain their efficacy."

In rats, Kelly et al[56] found "spinal CB1 receptors modulate the transmission of C- and A delta-fiber-evoked responses in anesthetized rats; this may reflect pre- and/or postsynaptic effects of cannabinoids on nociceptive transmission. CB1 receptors inhibit synaptic release of glutamate in rat dorsolateral striatum, a similar mechanism of action may underlie the effects of ACEA on noxious evoked responses of spinal neurons reported here." Chapman[57] found HU210 reduced spinal pain transmission in healthy, but not nerve-damaged rats. Johanek et al[58] concluded "cannabinoids possess antihyperalgesic properties at doses that alone do not produce antinociception, and are capable of acting at both spinal and peripheral sites" Bridges et al[59] found the CB1 agonist WIN55,212-2 reduced hyperalgesia in neuropathic pain, and concluded "cannabinoids may have therapeutic potential in neuropathic pain, and that this effect is mediated through the CB(1) receptor". Ross et al[60] suggested "analgesic actions of cannabinoids may be mediated by presynaptic inhibition of transmitter release in sensory neurones." In rats, Finn et al[61] reported "coadministration of a low dose of morphine, but not cannabidiol, with Delta9-THC, increased antinociception and 5-hydroxytryptamine levels in the thalamus in a model of persistent nociception". Labuda & Little[62] reported "The robust effects of the non-selective cannabinoid receptor agonist WIN55,212-2 and morphine support reports in the literature that systemic cannabinoid receptor agonists and opioids are active in neuropathic pain." Cox & Welch[63] found "Delta9-THC induces increased immunoreactive dynorphin A (idyn A) levels in nonarthritic rats while decreasing idyn A in arthritic rats. We hypothesize that the elevated idyn A level in arthritic rats contributes to hyperalgesia by interaction with N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors, and that Delta9-THC induces antinociception by decreasing idyn A release"

Farquhar-Smith et al[64], studying bladder pain models in rats found "Anandamide (via CB1 receptors) and palmitoylethanolamide (putatively via CB2 receptors) attenuated a referred hyperalgesia in a dose-dependent fashion. CB1 and CB2 receptors are strategically situated to influence the nerve growth factor-driven referred hyperalgesia associated with inflammation of the urinary bladder. These data implicate cannabinoids as a novel treatment for vesical pain.". Fox et al[65] concluded "cannabinoids are highly potent and efficacious antihyperalgesic agents in a model of neuropathic pain". Siegling et al[66] concluded "cannabinoid CB(1) receptor upregulation contributes to the increased analgesic efficacy of cannabinoids in chronic pain conditions". Studying deep-tissue pain in mice, Kehl et al[67] reported "cannabinoids differentially modulated carrageenan- and tumor-evoked hyperalgesia in terms of potency and receptor subtypes involved suggesting that differences in underlying mechanisms may exist between these two models of deep tissue pain." In a study of nerve injury in rats, Lim et al[68] concluded "upregulation of spinal CB1Rs following peripheral nerve injury may contribute to the therapeutic effects of exogenous cannabinoids on neuropathic pain" Following a study of the effects of a cannabinoid agonist in a rat model of diabetic neuropathy, Dogrul et al[69] concluded "cannabinoids have a potential beneficial effect on experimental diabetic neuropathic pain" Ulugol et al[70] found the CB1 agonist "WIN 55,212-2 has an antiallodynic effect in streptozocin-induced diabetic rats and may be a promising approach in the treatment of diabetic neuropathy."

Studying the relationship between gamma-hydroxybutyric acid (GABA) and cannabinoids in rat spinal cord, Naderi et al[71] reported "Our results confirm that intrathecal administration of cannabinoid and GABA(B) receptor agonists have analgesic effects and that spinal antinociceptive effects of GABA(B) receptor agonists are likely through endocannabinoid modulation."

Studying the function of the amygdala in rats, Manning et al[72] reported "The results constitute the first causal data demonstrating the necessity of descending pain-modulatory circuitry (of which the CeA is a component) for the full expression of cannabinoid-induced antinociception in the rat. Furthermore, the results complement previous findings suggesting an overlap in neural circuitry activated by opioids and cannabinoids." Azad et al[73] concluded "The endogenous cannabinoid system is involved in the control of neuroplasticity as part of pain processing . Cannabinoids prevent the formation of (long-term potentiation) in the amygdala via activation of CB1 receptors." Hohmann et al[74] noted "coordinated release of 2-AG and anandamide in the periaqueductal grey matter might mediate opioid-independent stress-induced analgesia"

Dyson et al[75] reported "CT-3 (ajulemic acid) is a cannabinoid receptor agonist and is efficacious in animal models of chronic pain by activation of the CB1 receptor. Whilst it shows significant cannabinoid-like CNS activity, it exhibits a superior therapeutic index compared to other cannabinoid compounds" Mitchell et al[76] reported "ajulemic acid reduces abnormal pain sensations associated with chronic pain without producing the motor side effects associated with THC and other non-selective cannabinoid receptor agonists" Costa et al[77] investigating a rat model of MS, noted that the CB1 receptor agonist "SR141716 is effective not only in alleviating neuropathic pain but also in favouring the nerve myelin repair" Combining spinal cannabinoids and yohimbine, 2-adrenoreceptor agonist, Khodayar et al[78] concluded "spinal cannabinoid and 2-adrenoceptor systems are able to induce antinociception in both phases of formalin test, and (2) the cannabinoid system may be involved in the antinociception induced by adrenoceptors in the early phase." Antonoiu et al[79] investigated the behavioural effects of 1',1'-dithiolane delta8-THC analogue AMG-3, a cannabinomimetic molecule with high affinity for CB1/CB2 receptors in rats, finding "the administration of AMG-3 to rats elicits a specific behavioral profile, most probably associated with the activation of CB1 receptors and without effects indicating abuse potential"

Malan et al[80] investigated the role of the CB2 cannabinoid receptor in regulation of peripheral pain, concluding "These findings demonstrate the local, peripheral nature of CB(2) cannabinoid antinociception. .. Peripheral antinociception without CNS effects is consistent with the peripheral distribution of CB(2) receptors. CB(2) receptor agonists may have promise clinically for the treatment of pain without CNS cannabinoid side effects." Monhemius et al[81] noted the CB1 agonist WIN 55,212-2 "markedly increased withdrawal latencies in the tail flick test and reduced responses to subcutaneous formalin. These effects were blocked by co-administration of (CB1 antagonist) SR141716A" and concluded "this system is important for the modulation of nociceptive transmission in an animal model of chronic neuropathic pain" Similar results were reported by Drew et al[82], who concluded "These results strengthen the body of evidence suggesting CB agonists may be an important novel analgesic approach for the treatment of sustained pain states." Nakamura et al[83] considered "peripheral endogenous cannabinoids such as anandamide are novel candidates for mediators that inhibit the excitation of nociceptors" Hanus et al[84] investigated the effects of a new CB2 receptor agonist (HU308), finding "HU-308 reduces blood pressure, blocks defecation, and elicits anti-inflammatory and peripheral analgesic activity. The hypotension, the inhibition of defecation, the anti-inflammatory and peripheral analgesic effects produced by HU-308 are blocked (or partially blocked) by the CB(2) antagonist SR-144528, but not by the CB(1) antagonist SR-141716A. These results demonstrate the feasibility of discovering novel nonpsychotropic cannabinoids that may lead to new therapies for hypertension, inflammation, and pain."

Johanek & Simone[85] concluded "cannabinoids primarily activate peripheral CB1 receptors to attenuate hyperalgesia. Activation of this receptor in the periphery may attenuate pain without causing unwanted side effects mediated by central CB1 receptors." McLaughlin et al[86] reported the CB1 receptor agonist "AM 411 dose-dependently produced behaviors consistent with CB1 agonism, including analgesia... which were blocked by a CB1-selective antagonist." Maione et al[87] concluded "endocannabinoids affect the descending pathways of pain control by acting at either CB(1) or TRPV1 receptors in healthy rats" Elmes et al[88] concluded "cannabinoid-based drugs have clinical potential for the treatment of established inflammatory pain responses"

An aerosol delivery system was tested in mice by Lichtman et al[89], who found "The antinociceptive effects occurred within 5 min of exposure and lasted approximately 40 min in duration" and noted "inhalation exposure to Delta(9)-THC failed to produce two other indices indicative of cannabinoid activity, hypothermia and decreases in spontaneous locomotor activity" Wiley et al[90] found the antinociceptive effects of different cannabinoids in rats depended upon the route of administration. Li et al[91] found "low doses of cannabinoids, which do not produce analgesia or impair motor function, attenuate chemogenic pain and possess antihyperalgesic properties" Valiveti et al[92] investigated permeation of cannabinoids across human skin with a view to developing products for topical application, and concluded "The permeation results indicated that WIN 55,212-2 mesylate, CP 55,940, and other potent synthetic cannabinoids with these physicochemical properties could be ideal candidates for the development of a transdermal therapeutic system."

Walker et al[93] concluded "cannabinoids suppress nociceptive neurotransmission at the level of the spinal cord and the thalamus. These effects are reversible, receptor mediated, selective for painful as opposed to nonpainful somatic stimuli, and track the behavioral analgesia both in time course and potency." Strangman et al[94] found "cannabinoids inhibit the activity-dependent facilitation of spinal nociceptive responses."

In monkeys, Manning et a found "systemic administration of the prototypical opioid morphine or the cannabinoid receptor agonist WIN55,212-2 produced dose-dependent antinociception on a warm-water tail-withdrawal assay. The antinociceptive effects of each drug were reversible with an appropriate antagonist" However the effect of the drug was significantly reduced in monkeys with amydaloid lesions, concluding "the possibility should be considered that, in the primate, "antinociceptive circuitry" and "fear circuitry" overlap at the level of the amygdala." Ko et al[95] found THC reduced responses to thermal and chemical pain in monkeys when applied locally.

In Amphibians, Salio et al[96] noted "An endocannabinoid system is well developed... in the amphibian brain... cannabinoids might participate in the control of pain sensitivity also in the amphibian spinal cord."

Interaction with opioid pain systems:

There is increasing evidence that the pain-relieving circuits modulated by endocannabinoids and opiates are closely-linked. Cichewicz & McCarthy[97] investigated synergy between THC and opiates in relieving pain, noting "The analgesic effects of opioids, such as morphine and codeine, in mice are enhanced by oral administration of the cannabinoid delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol (delta(9)-THC)."

Studying the interaction between cannabinoid and opioid systems in regulating pain & stress, Valverde et al[98] concluded "CB1 receptors are not involved in the antinociceptive responses to exogenous opioids, but that a physiological interaction between the opioid and cannabinoid systems is necessary to allow the development of opioid-mediated responses to stress." Also, Mao et al[99] found "The selective central cannabinoid receptor antagonist SR141716A, but not the generic opioid receptor antagonist naloxone, blocked the delta9-THC antinociception. Moreover, there is no cross-tolerance between the antinociceptive effects of morphine and delta9-THC in pathological pain states. ... the cannabinoid analgesic system may be superior to opioids in alleviating intractable pathological pain syndromes." Walkeret al[100] concluded "The existence of a cannabinergic pain-modulatory system may have relevance for the treatment of pain, particularly in instances where opiates are ineffective." Salio et al[101] found "A strong co-localization of CB1 and mu-opioid receptors was observed"

Fuentes et al[102] concluded "Current evidence indicate an interaction between cannabinoid and opioid systems, the latter being of known relevance in nociception. The fact that either exogenous or endogenous opioids enhanced cannabinoid-induced antinociception suggests simultaneous activation of both opioid and cannabinoid receptors by drugs as a new analgesic strategy."

Yesilyurt et al[103] suggested a combination of topical and spinal cannabinoid/opiate therapy noting "an antinociceptive interaction between topical opioids with topical, and spinal cannabinoids. These observations are significant in using of topical combination of cannabinoid and morphine in the management of pain." Dogrul et al[104] reported "a reduction in the spinal CB1 receptors may enhance sensitivity to sensory stimuli and a decrease in spinal antinociceptive potency to cannabinoid agonists... 'knock-down' of spinal CB1 receptors apparently lowers the thresholds for sensory input", Gardell et al[105] noted "...antinociception produced by spinal cannabinoids are likely to be mediated directly through activation of cannabinoid receptors" Yesilyurt & Dogrul[106] concluded "opioids and cannabinoids produce antinociception through mechanisms that are independent of each other at either the systemic or peripheral levels." Vigano et al[107] commented "This might open up new therapeutic opportunities for relief of chronic pain through cannabinoid-opioid coadministration." Kim et al[108] suggested "a direct action of anandamide on Na+ channels. The inhibition of Na+ currents in sensory neurons may contribute to the anandamide analgesia." Vaughan[109] concluded "non-opioid SIA (stress-induced analgesia) is mediated by two independent endocannabinoids within the midbrain. Furthermore, novel agents that disrupt breakdown of these endocannabinoids enhance non-opioid SIA and pave the way for novel therapies."

New Developments in cannabinoid receptor research

Development of synthetic cannabinoids are leading to an explosion of research into new applications[110]. Salio et al[111] noted the widespread distribution of CB-1 receptors and concluded "ubiquitous localization may account for the complex role played by cannabinoids in antinociception" Investigating the cannabinoid system in detail, Goutopolis et al[112] noted "The four cannabinoid system proteins, including the CB(1) and CB(2) receptors, fatty acid amide hydrolase, and the anandamide transporter, are excellent targets for the development of novel medications for various conditions, including pain, immunosuppression, peripheral vascular disease, appetite enhancement or suppression, and motor disorders." Wilson & Nicoll[113] noted "In contrast to classical neurotransmitters, endogenous cannabinoids can function as retrograde synaptic messengers: They are released from postsynaptic neurons and travel backward across synapses, activating CB1 on presynaptic axons and suppressing neurotransmitter release. Cannabinoids may affect memory, cognition, and pain perception by means of this cellular mechanism." Gardell et al[114] reported "like opioids, repeated spinal administration of a cannabinoid CB1 agonist elicits abnormal pain, which results in increased expression of spinal dynorphin. Manipulations that block cannabinoid-induced pain also block the behavioral manifestation of cannabinoid tolerance"

CB2-receptor studies: Malan et al[115] investigated the effect of CB-2 receptors on pain perception and observed "CB(2) receptor activation is sufficient to inhibit acute nociception, inflammatory hyperalgesia, and the allodynia and hyperalgesia produced in a neuropathic pain model. Studies using site-specific administration of agonist and antagonist have suggested that CB(2) receptor agonists inhibit pain responses by acting at peripheral sites. CB(2) receptor activation also inhibits edema and plasma extravasation produced by inflammation. CB(2) receptor-selective agonists do not produce central nervous system (CNS) effects typical of cannabinoids" They later concluded[116] "CB(2) receptor activation inhibits acute, inflammatory and neuropathic pain responses in animal models. In preclinical studies, CB(2) receptor agonists do not produce central nervous system effects. Therefore, they show promise for the treatment of acute and chronic pain without psychoactive effects." Ibrahim et al[117] found "a mechanism leading to the inhibition of pain, one that targets receptors localized exclusively outside the CNS. Further, they suggest the potential use of CB2 receptor-selective agonists for treatment of human neuropathic pain, a condition currently without consistently effective therapies. CB2 receptor-selective agonist medications are predicted to be without the CNS side effects that limit the effectiveness of currently available medications." Yoon & Choi[118] noted "The antinociception of WIN 55,212-2 is mediated through the cannabinoid 1 receptor, but not the cannabinoid 2 receptor, at the spinal level." Dogrul et al[119] concluded "there is an antinociceptive synergy between peripheral and spinal sites of cannabinoid action and it also implicates that local activation of cannabinoid system may regulate pain initiation in cutaneous tissue. Our findings support that cannabinoid system participates in buffering the emerging pain signals at the peripheral sites in addition to their spinal and supraspinal sites of action. In addition, an antinociceptive synergy between topical and spinal cannabinoid actions exists. These results also indicate that topically administered cannabinoid agonists may reduce pain without the dysphoric side effects and abuse potential of centrally acting cannabimimetic drugs." Quartillo et al[120] concluded "Local, peripheral CB2 receptor activation inhibits inflammation and inflammatory hyperalgesia. These results suggest that peripheral CB2 receptors may be an appropriate target for eliciting relief of inflammatory pain without the CNS effects of nonselective cannabinoid receptor agonists." Hohmann et al[121] noted "actions at cannabinoid CB(2) receptors are sufficient to normalize nociceptive thresholds and produce antinociception in persistent pain states."

Scott et al[122] suggested "a role for CB-2 receptor-mediated antinociception in both acute and neuropathic pain in addition to centrally located CB-1 mechanisms." Nackley et al[123] noted "activation of cannabinoid CB2 receptors is sufficient to suppress neuronal activity at central levels of processing in the spinal dorsal horn. Our findings are consistent with the ability of AM1241 to normalize nociceptive thresholds and produce antinociception in inflammatory pain states." Ibrahim et al[124] concluded "CB(2) receptor activation stimulates release from keratinocytes of beta-endorphin, which acts at local neuronal mu-opioid receptors to inhibit nociception... This mechanism allows for the local release of beta-endorphin, where CB(2) receptors are present, leading to anatomical specificity of opioid effects." Valenzano et al[125] concluded "CB2 receptor agonists have the potential to treat pain without eliciting the centrally-mediated side effects associated with non-selective cannabinoid agonists" Sagar et al[126] observed "At the level of the spinal cord, CB2 receptors have inhibitory effects in neuropathic, but not sham-operated rats suggesting that spinal CB2 may be an important analgesic target". Fox & Bevan[127] advised "The design of novel compounds that either specifically target peripheral CB(1) receptors or display high selectivity for CB(2) receptors may offer avenues for harnessing the analgesic effect of CB receptor agonists while avoiding the central adverse events seen with cannabinoid structures." Wotherspoon et al[128] noted "This clear demonstration of CB(2) receptors on sensory neurons suggests an additional cellular target for CB(2) agonist induced analgesia, at least in neuropathic models." Whiteside et al[129], investigating the CB2-receptor agonist GW405833 in rats, concluded "antihyperalgesic effects of GW405833 are mediated via the cannabinoid CB2 receptor, whereas the analgesic and sedative effects are not", Labuda et al[130] concluded "selective cannabinoid CB2 receptor agonists might represent a new class of postoperative analgesics"

Clayton et al[131] found "The CB2 agonist, 1-(2,3-Dichlorobenzoyl)-5-methoxy-2-methyl-(2-(morpholin-4-yl)ethyl)-1H-indole (GW405833) inhibited the hypersensitivity and was anti-inflammatory in vivo. These effects were blocked by SR144528. These findings suggest that CB1 receptors are involved in nociceptive pain and that both CB1 and CB2 receptors are involved in inflammatory hypersensitivity." Elmes et al[132] concluded "activation of peripheral CB2 receptors attenuates both innocuous- and noxious-evoked responses of WDR neurons in models of acute, inflammatory and neuropathic pain." Dajani et al[133] reported on CT3, a novel cannabinoid developed by Atlantic pharmaceuticals, noting "CT-3 showed more prolonged duration of analgesic action than morphine (and)... warrants clinical development as a novel anti-inflammatory and analgesic drug." Mason et al[134] postluated a "critical role for dynorphin A release in the initiation of the antinociceptive effects of the cannabinoids at the spinal level"

Palmitoylethanolamine (PEA) - Lambert et al[135] found palmitoyl-ethanolamine (PEA), a shorter and fully saturated analogue of anandamide to be "found in most mammalian tissues... accumulated during inflammation and has been demonstrated to have a number of anti-inflammatory effects, including beneficial effects in clinically relevant animal models of inflammatory pain" Di Marzo et al[136] considered cannabimimetic fatty acids to play a role in the control of tissue inflammation. In a 2002 review, Brune[137] concluded "molecular biology and genomics have led to the development of new target-selective chemical entities for use in pain relief. These include .... blockers or agonists of cannabinoid and vanilloid receptors"

Vanilloid/Capsiacin receptors - Studying capsiacin and vanilloid receptor responses to cannabinoids, Zygmunt et al[138] noted "The THC response depends on extracellular calcium but does not involve known voltage-operated calcium channels, glutamate receptors, or protein kinases A and C. These results may indicate the presence of a novel cannabinoid receptor/ion channel in the pain pathway." A similar study by Rukwied et al[139] described "analgesic and anti-hyperalgesic properties of a topically applied cannabinoid receptor ligand, which might have important therapeutic implications in humans" Oshita et al[140] concluded "CB(1)-receptor stimulation modulates the activities of transient receptor potential vanilloid receptor 1 in cultured rat DRG cells." Singh Tahim et al[141] concluded "inflammatory mediators significantly increase the excitatory potency and efficacy of anandamide on vanilloid type 1 transient receptor potential receptor, thus, increasing the anandamide concentration in, or around the peripheral terminals of nociceptors might rather evoke than decrease inflammatory heat hyperalgesia." Szallasi[142] found "arvanil, a combined agonist of VR1 and CB1 receptors, has already proved to be a powerful analgesic drug in the mouse." Brooks et al[143] reported "Activation of cannabinoid receptors causes inhibition of spasticity, in a mouse model of multiple sclerosis, and of persistent pain, in the rat formalin test. The endocannabinoid anandamide inhibits spasticity and persistent pain", finding that anandamide is a full agonist of vanilloid receptors[144] which are associated with antispastic and analgesic activity.

Enzyme Studies: Cravatt & Lichtmann[145] investigated the possibility of blocking enzymes which break down anandamide to boost endocannabinoid activity, and noted "anandamide, a natural lipid ligand for CB1, and an enzyme, fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH), that terminates anandamide signaling have inspired pharmacological strategies to augment endogenous cannabinoid ('endocannabinoid') activity with FAAH inhibitors" Lichtmann et al[146] concluded "selective inhibitors of FAAH might represent a viable pharmacological approach for the clinical treatment of pain disorders", and later[147] reported FAAH inhibitors to "raise central nervous system levels of anandamide and promote cannabinoid receptor 1-dependent analgesia in several assays of pain sensation." Rodella et al[148] considered the anadamide reuptake inhibitor "AM404 could be a useful drug to reduce neuropathic pain and that cannabinoid CB1 receptor, cannabinoid CB2 receptor and vanilloid TRPV-1 receptor are involved." Suplita et al[149] found "In all conditions, the antinociceptive effects of each FAAH inhibitor were completely blocked by coadministration of the CB(1) antagonist rimonabant. The present results provide evidence that a descending cannabinergic neural system is activated by environmental stressors to modulate pain sensitivity in a CB(1)-dependent manner." Jayamane et al[150] concluded "FAAH inhibitor URB597 produces cannabinoid CB(1) and CB(2) receptor-mediated analgesia in inflammatory pain states, without causing the undesirable side effects associated with cannabinoid receptor activation" La Rana et al[151] found "a role of the endocannabinoid system in pain modulation and point to anandamide transport as a potential target for analgesic drug development" De Lago[152] et al studied the effects of UCM707, an endocannabinoid reuptake inhibitor, and commented "UCM707, as suggested by its in vitro properties, seems also to behave in vivo as a selective and potent inhibitor of the endocannabinoid transporter, showing negligible direct effects on the receptors for endocannabinoids but potentiating the action of these endogenous compounds."

Human Studies & Clinical Trials

Although Whiteley[153] noted "human studies are few and far between and have been held up by the law and the lack of standardised extracts", in recent years, many clinical trials have been performed on cannabis-based medicines and individual cannabinoids.

In early studies, Mechoulam found inconclusive results on pain relief from human subjects, although the dosages in most studies were lower than those found effective in animal models. He concluded that there was "significant analgesic activity" from THC, remarking that the lack of any physical dependence was "a plus", although he was concerned about the "psychotomimetic" effects (i.e. the high) particularly for individuals unused to the drug. In an earlier review[154] Mechoulam had considered the traditional use of cannabis preparations as analgesic and anti-rheumatic agents to have "some modern substantiation".

Noyes et al[155] found a clear dose-related analgesic effect from oral administration of THC. In a second study[156] the analgesic effect was found to be six times as powerful as that of codeine, with 20mg THC producing significant pain relief for over 5 hours. He considered the side effects (sedation and light-headedness) to mitigate against wider clinical use. However, his subjects were inexperienced with marijuana use and as such may have found the psychological effects of the high more disturbing, and thus less tolerable, than experienced users. Milstein et al[157] found that experienced marijuana users exposed to approximately 7.5mg THC by inhalation, achieved a greater analgesic effect than naive subjects, and were less likely to report adverse side effects. Whether this increased response is due to more efficient inhalation techniques in the experienced group, or through a "reverse tolerance" whereby THC has a greater effect in habitués, is not clear.

Pertwee[158] reports a number of patients suffering spinal injury or multiple sclerosis claiming cannabis relieves spasticity and pain associated with muscle spasms more effectively than conventional muscle relaxants and with more tolerable side effects. Several clinical trials have supported these claims[159] [160] [161], indicating that oral THC or inhalation of cannabis smoke can relieve muscle pain and spasticity. In a small-scale clinical trial of THC, Elsner et al[162] found half the patients achieved sufficient pain relief, but noted "large individual differences in the effectiveness of THC in pain management"

Burstein[163] finds evidence that the carboxylic acid derivatives of THC and other cannabinoids may have potent analgesic and/or anti-inflammatory activity. Several of these derivatives are present in the body fluids of cannabis users as non-psychoactive metabolites of the drug. These derivatives may offer a potential advantage in that they are more water-soluble than THC. Jbilo et al[164], studing the effects of gene expression on human cannabinoid receptors, reported: 'our data highlight a possible new function of peripheral cannabinoid receptors in the modulation of immune and inflammatory responses '

Williamson & Evans[165] noted "Small clinical studies have confirmed the usefulness of THC as an analgesic; CBD and CBG also have analgesic and antiinflammatory effects" Vaughan & Christie[166] concluded "Cannabinoids have significant analgesic properties in animal models, particularly for chronic pain states, but there are few human studies. Well-controlled clinical trials on cannabinoids, and cannabinoid delivery systems, are now required." Kinzbrunner[167] criticised the "adverse psychotropic effects" of cannabis but conceded "cannabinoids and codeine have similar effects on pain relief" Elsner et al[168] reviewed 6 pain patients treated with THC (oral, 5-20mg/d) finding large individual differences in the analgesic response, 3 patients achieving satisfactory pain relief, the other three experiencing "intolerable side effects such as nausea, dizziness and sedation without a reduction of pain intensity"

Haney et al[169] studying responses of 12 subjects to active and placebo marijuana cigarettes, postulated a cannabis withdrawal syndrome, reporting "Abstinence from active marijuana increased ratings such as "Anxious," "Irritable," and "Stomach pain," and significantly decreased food intake compared to baseline." Haney et al[170] administered the opioid antagonist naltrexone to marijuana smokers, and reported "naltrexone increases the subjective effects of oral THC. Thus, oral THC's effects are enhanced rather than antagonized by opioid receptor blockade in heavy marijuana smokers."

Clermont-Gnamien et al[171] treated chronic pain patients with oral THC and noted "THC did not induce significant effect on the various pain, HRQL and anxiety and depression scores. Numerous side effects (notably sedation and asthenia) were observed in 5 patients out of 7, requiring premature discontinuation of the drug in 3 patients... The present study did not reveal any significant efficacy of THC in a small cohort of patients with chronic refractory neuropathic pain, but underlined the unfavorable side effect profile of the drug. These results may partly relate to the fact that oral dronabinol exhibits a poor therapeutic ratio (efficacy at the price of side effects)." In Denmark, a trial of Dronabinol among MS patients by Svendsen et al[172] found "Dronabinol reduced the spontaneous pain intensity significantly compared with placebo (4.0 (2.3-6.0) vs. 5.0 (4.0-6.4), median (25th-75th percentiles), p = 0.02). Though dronabinol's analgesic effect is modest, its use should be evaluated considering the general difficulty in treating central pain"

Naef et al[173] tested THC, Morphine and a combination on induced pain in healthy volunteers, and reported "THC did not significantly reduce pain. In the cold and heat tests it even produced hyperalgesia, which was completely neutralized by THC-morphine. A slight additive analgesic effect could be observed for THC-morphine in the electrical stimulation test. No analgesic effect resulted in the pressure and heat test, neither with THC nor THC-morphine. Psychotropic and somatic side-effects (sleepiness, euphoria, anxiety, confusion, nausea, dizziness, etc.) were common, but usually mild." Roberts et al[174] found "neither morphine nor Delta(9)-THC had a significant effect, there was a positive analgesic interaction between the two (p = 0.012), indicating that the combination had a synergistic affective analgesic effect" however Seeling et al[175] found "neither a synergistic nor even an additive antinociceptive interaction between (9)-tetrahydrocannabinol and the mu-opioid agonist piritramide in a setting of acute postoperative pain."

Killestein et al[176] conducted a clinical trial of oral THC and cannabis plant extracts on 16 MS patients, and noted "Both drugs were safe, but adverse events were more common with plant-extract treatment. Compared with placebo, neither THC nor plant-extract treatment reduced spasticity." Following a clinical trial of cannabis plant extracts, Wade et al[177] reported "Pain relief associated with both THC and CBD was significantly superior to placebo... Cannabis medicinal extracts can improve neurogenic symptoms unresponsive to standard treatments. Unwanted effects are predictable and generally well tolerated." Berman et al[178] reported "The (mean pain severity score) failed to fall by the two points defined in our hypothesis. However, both this measure and measures of sleep showed statistically significant improvements. The study medications were generally well tolerated with the majority of adverse events, including intoxication type reactions, being mild to moderate in severity and resolving spontaneously" In a trial on trigeminal neuralgia Liang et al[179] concluded "cannabinoids may prove useful in pain modulation by inhibiting neuronal transmission in pain pathways. Considering the pronounced antinociceptive effects produced by cannabinoids, they may be a promising therapeutic approach for the clinical management of trigeminal neuralgia"

A clinical trial of oral THC by Buggy et al[180] found "no evidence of an analgesic effect of orally administered delta-9-THC 5 mg in postoperative pain in humans.", a similar trial by Attal et al[181] found "THC (mean dosage: 16.6+/-6.5 mg/day) did not induce any significant effects on ongoing and paroxysmal pain, allodynia, quality of life, anxiety/depression scores and functional impact of pain. These results do not support an overall benefit of THC in pain and quality of life in patients with refractory neuropathic pain" In a trial of Dronabinol on MS patients, Svendsen et al[182] concluded "Dronabinol has a modest but clinically relevant analgesic effect on central pain in patients with multiple sclerosis. Adverse events, including dizziness, were more frequent with dronabinol than with placebo during the first week of treatment."

After a clinical trial of 1',1'dimethylheptyl-Delta8-tetrahydrocannabinol-11-oic acid (CT-3), a potent analogue of THC-11-oic acid, Karst et al[183] concluded "CT-3 was effective in reducing chronic neuropathic pain compared with placebo. No major adverse effects were observed" In a separate trial of CT3, Burstein et al[184] found "In preclinical studies (CT3) displayed many of the properties of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs); however, it seems to be free of undesirable side effects. The initial short-term trials in healthy human subjects, as well as in patients with chronic neuropathic pain, demonstrated a complete absence of psychotropic actions. Moreover, it proved to be more effective than placebo in reducing this type of pain as measured by the visual analog scale. Unlike the narcotic analgesics, signs of dependency were not observed after withdrawal of the drug at the end of the one-week treatment period." Salim et al[185] found ajulemic acid (CT3) "shows pain-reducing effects on patients with chronic neuropathic pain without clinically relevant psychotropic or physical side effects"

A study of nabilone in 20 chronic pain patients by Berlach et al[186] found "Fifteen patients reported subjective overall improvement with nabilone, and nine reported reduced pain intensity. Beneficial effects on sleep and nausea were the main reasons for continuing use. Intolerable side effects were experienced in three patients (palpitations, urinary retention, dry mouth). Nabilone may be a useful addition to pain management and should be further evaluated in randomized controlled trials."

Sativex Trials - In 2003 GW Pharmaceuticals[187] announced ongoing clinical trials of cannabis extracts (Sativex) for the following conditions:

(a) the relief of pain of neurological origin and defects of neurological function in the following indications: multiple sclerosis (MS), spinal cord injury, peripheral nerve injury, central nervous system damage, neuroinvasive cancer, dystonias, cerebral vascular accident and spina bifida, as well as for the relief of pain and inflammation in rheumatoid arthritis and also pain relief in brachial plexus injury.

(b) spasticity and bladder dysfunction in multiple sclerosis patients

(c) spinal cord injury

(d) High CBD in various CNS disorders (including epilepsy, stroke and head injury).

(e) THC:CBD (broad ratio) in patients with inflammatory bowel disease

(f) High CBD in patients with psychotic disorders such as schizophrenia, and a preclinical trial of High CBD in various CNS disorders (including epilepsy, stroke and head injury).

(g) THC:CBD (narrow ratio) in the following medical conditions: pain in spinal cord injury, pain and sleep in MS and spinal cord injury, neuropathic pain in MS and general neuropathic pain (presented as allodynia). Results from these trials show that THC:CBD (narrow ratio) caused statistically significant reductions in neuropathic pain in patients with MS and other conditions. In addition, improvements in other MS symptoms were observed as well.

(h) THC:CBD (broad ratio) in a small number of patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

In September 2001, preliminary results were reported from the GW Pharmaceuticals clinical trials of a sub-lingual cannabis-extract spray on pain management: "Only one of the 23 patients failed to benefit from the cannabis spray and two others dropped out because of side effects. The remaining 18 experienced pain relief that varied from moderate ( "at least I can sleep at night" ) to dramatic ( "it has transformed my life" ). Patients on morphine to control severe pain were able to cut their doses dramatically."[188] In November 2002 the results of phase III trials were announced by GW Pharmaceuticals[189] "In a double-blind crossover study comparing the efficacy of GW's THC:CBD product, GW's THC alone product and placebo in the treatment of neuropathic pain in 48 patients with Brachial Plexus Injury, both the THC:CBD medicine and the THC medicine provided highly statistically significant relief of pain and statistically significant reduction in sleep disturbance. Brachial plexus injury is a rare but particularly challenging cause of intractable neuropathic pain, and to the best of our knowledge this is the first placebo-controlled trial ever conducted in this condition. The benefits seen in all four studies are all the more notable in that they represent improvements over and above that which patients obtain with their standard prescription medicines (patients receiving both active and placebo medicines continued to take their standard prescription medicines during the trial)." In a UK clinical trial of cannabis extracts on MS symptoms, Zajicek et al found "objective improvement in mobility and patients' opinion of an improvement in pain (which) suggest cannabinoids might be clinically useful" In a sister trial of chronic pain Notcutt et al[190] noted "Extracts which contained THC proved most effective in symptom control. Regimens for the use of the sublingual spray emerged and a wide range of dosing requirements was observed. Side-effects were common, reflecting a learning curve for both patient and study team. These were generally acceptable and little different to those seen when other psycho-active agents are used for chronic pain." An open-label trial on MS patients by Brady et al[191] found "Patient self-assessment of pain, spasticity and quality of sleep improved significantly (P <0.05, Wilcoxon's signed rank test) with pain improvement continuing up to median of 35 weeks." Szendrei[192] commented on the potential of Sativex in European medicine "The new analgesic is proposed for the treatment of muscle spasticity and pains accompanying multiple sclerosis and as an efficient analgetic for neurogenic pain not responding well to opioids and to other therapies available."

Wade et al[193] investigated Sativex in MS patients, finding "Following CBME the primary symptom score reduced from mean (SE) 74.36 (11.1) to 48.89 (22.0) following CBME and from 74.31 (12.5) to 54.79 (26.3) following placebo [ns]. Spasticity VAS scores were significantly reduced by CBME (Sativex) in comparison with placebo (P =0.001). There were no significant adverse effects on cognition or mood and intoxication was generally mild." In a further UK trial of Sativex by Rog et al[194] found it "superior to placebo in reducing the mean intensity of pain. and sleep disturbance" concluding "Cannabis-based medicine is effective in reducing pain and sleep disturbance in patients with multiple sclerosis related central neuropathic pain and is mostly well tolerated." Blake et al[195] found "In comparison with placebo, (sativex) produced statistically significant improvements in pain on movement, pain at rest, quality of sleep" Perras[196] reported "In some trials, THC:CBD spray significantly reduced neuropathic pain, spasticity, muscle spasms and sleep disturbances. The most common adverse events (AEs) reported in trials were dizziness, sleepiness, fatigue, feeling of intoxication and a bad taste."

Russo & Guy[197], reviewing the clinical trials of sativex, noted "CBD is demonstrated to antagonise some undesirable effects of THC including intoxication, sedation and tachycardia, while contributing analgesic, anti-emetic, and anti-carcinogenic properties in its own right. In modern clinical trials, this has permitted the administration of higher doses of THC, providing evidence for clinical efficacy and safety for cannabis based extracts in treatment of spasticity, central pain and lower urinary tract symptoms in multiple sclerosis, as well as sleep disturbances, peripheral neuropathic pain, brachial plexus avulsion symptoms, rheumatoid arthritis and intractable cancer pain. The hypothesis that the combination of THC and CBD increases clinical efficacy while reducing adverse events is supported."

Learned Reviews & Therapeutic Assessments

Assessing the oral route of administration of cannabinoid medicines, Pertwee[198] concluded "When taken orally, THC seems to undergo variable absorption and to have a narrow 'therapeutic window' (dose range in which it is effective without producing significant unwanted effects). This makes it difficult to predict an oral dose that will be both effective and tolerable to a patient and indicates a need for better cannabinoid formulations and modes of administration" Pertwee summarised in a 2001 review "Mammalian tissues contain at least two types of cannabinoid receptor, CB(1) and CB(2)... CB(1) receptors are expressed mainly by neurones of the central and peripheral nervous system whereas CB(2) receptors occur centrally and peripherally in certain non-neuronal tissues, particularly in immune cells... antinociception can be mediated by cannabinoid receptors other than CB(1) and CB(2) receptors, for example CB(2)-like receptors... one endogenous cannabinoid, anandamide, produces antinociception through mechanisms that differ from those of other types of cannabinoid, for example by acting on vanilloid receptor... the endocannabinoid system has physiological and/or pathophysiological roles in the modulation of pain."

In a 2001 review, Rice[199] noted "Strong laboratory evidence now underwrites anecdotal claims of cannabinoid analgesia in inflammatory and neuropathic pain." Tsou et al[200] concluded "cannabinoids inhibit the spinal processing of nociceptive stimuli and ... endogenous cannabinoids may act naturally to modify pain transmission within the central nervous system." Welch et al[201] reported "Delta(9)-THC and morphine can be useful in low dose combination as an analgesic. .. We hypothesize the existence of a new CB receptor differentially linked to endogenous opioid systems ... Such a receptor, due to the release of endogenous opioids, may have significant impact upon the clinical development of cannabinoid/opioid combinations for the treatment of a variety of types of pain in humans" Martin & Lichtman[202] concluded "The use of cannabis for the management of a wide range of painful disorders has been well documented in case reports throughout history. ... THC and its synthetic derivatives have been shown to be effective in most animal models of pain. These antinociceptive effects are mediated through cannabinoid receptors in the brain that in turn appear to interact with noradrenergic and kappa opioid systems in the spinal cord to modulate the perception of painful stimuli. The endogenous ligand, anandamide, is also an effective antinociceptive agent." When considering options for postoperative pain,Dahl & Raeder[203] concluded "cannabinoids... may become important analgesic drugs."

In a review article for the BMJ, Campbell et al[204] considered "Cannabinoids are no more effective than codeine in controlling pain and have depressant effects on the central nervous system that limit their use. Their widespread introduction into clinical practice for pain management is therefore undesirable. In acute postoperative pain they should not be used. Before cannabinoids can be considered for treating spasticity and neuropathic pain, further valid randomised controlled studies are needed." This sparked a lively debate in the letters pages with Campbell's review being widely-criticised. Curatolo et al[205], following a general review of pain management options, concluded "Cannabinoid agents produce antinociception and prevent experimentally induced hyperalgesia in animals, and they may find a role in pain management" Iversen[206] concluded "cannabinoid agonists are antihyperalgesic and antiallodynic in models of neuropathic pain", but also warned[207] "Few well controlled trials of cannabis exist for systemic review."

Du Pont[208], opposing the use of medical marijuana, warned "most supporters of smoked marijuana are hostile to the use of purified chemicals from marijuana, insisting that only smoked marijuana leaves be used as "medicine," revealing clearly that their motivation is not scientific medicine but the back door legalization of marijuana.". In response, Rosenthal & Kleber[209] proposed "parallel trials on those indications under careful controls making marijuana available to appropriate patients who fail to benefit from standard existing treatments."

Hollister[210] considered smoked marijuana should be investigated for efficacy in conditions including chronic pain syndrome. Clark[211] argued "there is a proportionate reason for allowing physicians to prescribe marijuana. Seriously ill patients have the right to effective therapies. To deny patients access to such a therapy is to deny them dignity and respect as persons." The US Institute of Medicine[212] concluded "the available evidence from human and animal studies indicates that cannabinoids can have a substantial analgesic effect."

In 2002 reviews, Pertwee & Ross[213] observed "Potential therapeutic uses of cannabinoid receptor agonists include the management of multiple sclerosis/spinal cord injury, pain, inflammatory disorders, glaucoma, bronchial asthma, vasodilation that accompanies advanced cirrhosis, and cancer." Pertwee[214] also noted "There is a growing amount of evidence to suggest that cannabis and individual cannabinoids may be effective in suppressing certain symptoms of multiple sclerosis and spinal cord injury, including spasticity and pain... Future research should also be directed at obtaining more conclusive evidence about the efficacy of cannabis or individual cannabinoids against the signs and symptoms of these disorders, at devising better modes of administration for cannabinoids and at exploring strategies that maximize separation between the sought-after therapeutic effects and the unwanted effects of these drugs." Fride[215] noted "Endocannabinoids have been implicated in a variety of physiological functions. The areas of central activities include pain reduction, motor regulation, learning/memory, and reward." Walker & Huang[216] reported "endocannabinods function to control pain in parallel with endogenous opioids but via different mechanisms" adding[217] "Multiple lines of evidence indicate that endocannabinoids serve naturally to suppress pain. While it is now clear that cannabinoids suppress nociceptive neurotransmission, more work is needed to establish the clinical utility of these compounds. The few human studies conducted to date produced mixed results, with more promising findings coming from studies of clinical pain as compared with experimental pain." Rice et al[218] stated "Whilst a proportion of the peripheral analgesic effect of endocannabinoids can be attributed to a neuronal mechanism acting through CB(1) receptors expressed by primary afferent neurones, the antiinflammatory actions of endocannabinoids, mediated through CB(2) receptors, also appears to contribute to local analgesic effects." and Fernandez-Ruiz et al[219] noted "cannabinoids and related compounds (are) a promising new line of research for therapeutic treatment of a variety of conditions, such as brain injury, chronic pain, glaucoma, asthma, cancer and AIDS-associated effects and other pathologies. Motor disorders are another promising field for the therapeutic application of cannabinoid-related compounds, since the control of movement is one of the more relevant physiological roles of the endocannabinoid transmission in the brain. There are two pathologies, Parkinson's disease and Huntington's chorea, which are particularly interesting from a clinical point of view due to the direct relationship of endocannabinoids and their receptors with neurons that degenerate in those disorders." Beaulieu & Rice[220] concluded "The cannabinoid system is a major target in the treatment of pain and its therapeutic potential should be assessed in the near future by the performance of new clinical trials." Reviewing pain relief in MS, Smith[221] cautioned "In the case of pain, most of the available trials suggest that cannabinoids are not superior to existing treatments; however, few trials have examined chronic pain syndromes" Walker et al[222] observed "The brain produces at least five compounds that possess sub-micromolar affinity for cannabinoid receptors: anandamide, 2-arachidonoylglycerol, noladin ether, virodhamine, and N-arachidonoyldopamine (NADA). One function of these and/or related compounds is to suppress pain sensitivity. Much evidence supports a role of endocannabinoids in pain modulation in general, and some evidence points to the role of particular endocannabinoids."

Fowler[223] noted "the anaesthetic agent propofol and the non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs indomethacin and flurbiprofen (when given spinally), activate cannabinoid receptors as an important part of their actions" Fowler et al[224] later commented "With respect to the treatment of pain, topical CB1 agonists and CB2 agonists may prove therapeutically useful, and there is evidence that the non-steroidal inflammatory agent indomethacin produces effects secondary to activation of the endocannabinoid system" and welcomed[225] "peripherally acting CB agonists and CB2 receptor-selective agonists for the treatment of pain," Hough et al[226] concluded "Present and previous studies suggest that Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol may act at both CB(1) and other receptors to relieve pain"

Grotenhermen[227] commented in 2004 "Properties of cannabinoids that might be of therapeutic use include analgesia, muscle relaxation, immunosuppression, anti-inflammation, anti-allergic effects, sedation, improvement of mood, stimulation of appetite, anti-emesis, lowering of intraocular pressure, bronchodilation, neuroprotection and antineoplastic effects." In a 2005 review Grotenhermen[228] noted "Properties of CB receptor agonists that are of therapeutic interest include analgesia, muscle relaxation, immunosuppression, anti-inflammation, antiallergic effects, improvement of mood, stimulation of appetite, antiemesis, lowering of intraocular pressure, bronchodilation, neuroprotection and antineoplastic effects. The current main focus of clinical research is their efficacy in chronic pain and neurological disorders. CB receptor antagonists are under investigation for medical use in obesity and nicotine addiction. Additional potential was proposed for the treatment of alcohol and heroine dependency, schizophrenia, conditions with lowered blood pressure, Parkinson's disease and memory impairment in Alzheimer's disease." Russo concluded[229] "Migraine, fibromyalgia, IBS and related conditions display common clinical, biochemical and pathophysiological patterns that suggest an underlying clinical endocannabinoid deficiency that may be suitably treated with cannabinoid medicines." Martin & Wiley[230] concluded "The endocannabinoid system has been found to be a key modulator of systems involved in pain perception, emesis, and reward pathways." Cravatt & Lichtmann[231] concluded "investigations support a role for endocannabinoids in modulating behavioral responses to acute, inflammatory, and neuropathic pain stimuli." Rukwied et al[232] observed "In clinical studies oral administration of cannabinoids indicated beneficial results during the therapy of multiple sclerosis, weight loss, nausea and vomiting due to chemotherapy, and intractable pruritus. However, therapy of chronic pain conditions revealed conflicting results and unequivocal success could not have been delivered due to unwanted side effects." Rodriguez de Fonseca et al[233] concluded "Recent pharmacological advances have led to the synthesis of cannabinoid receptor agonists and antagonists, anandamide uptake blockers and potent, selective inhibitors of endocannabinoid degradation. These new tools have enabled the study of the physiological roles played by the endocannabinoids and have opened up new strategies in the treatment of pain, obesity, neurological diseases including multiple sclerosis, emotional disturbances such as anxiety and other psychiatric disorders including drug addiction." However, Killestein et al[234] warned "convincing scientific evidence that cannabinoids are effective in neurological conditions is still lacking. --However, it is also not possible to conclude definitely that cannabinoids are ineffective"

Bradshaw & Walker[235] noted "the growing diversity of recently discovered putative lipid mediators and their relationship to the endogenous cannabinoid system. The possibility that there remain many unidentified signalling lipids coupled with the evidence that many of these yield bioactive metabolites due to actions of known enzymes (e.g. cyclooxygenases, lipoxygenases, cytochrome P450s) suggests the existence of a large and complex family of lipid mediators about which only little is known at this time. The elucidation of the biochemistry and pharmacology of these compounds may provide therapeutic targets for a variety of conditions including sleep dysfunction, eating disorders, cardiovascular disease, as well as inflammation and pain." Schneider et al[236] concluded "cannabinoids may prove useful in... diseases, e.g. movement disorders such as Gilles de la Tourette's syndrome, multiple sclerosis, and pain." Corey[237] concluded "Cannabinoids may be useful for conditions that currently lack effective treatment, such as spasticity, tics and neuropathic pain. New delivery systems for cannabinoids and cannabis-based medicinal extracts, as well as new cannabinoid derivatives expand the options for cannabinoid therapy." Radbruch & Elsner[238] noted "Cannabinoids such as tetrahydrocannabinol offer a valuable add-on option for cancer patients with refractory pain, spasticity, nausea or appetite loss." In a review of MS research, Malfitano et al[239] concluded "increase